Friday, February 15, 2008
This is a fantastic article I saw in the Aspen Times.
I think the author nailed it. The one group noone has pandered to in this election race is the Angry White Man...the group to which I belong.
It's a bit tongue-in-cheek...but it does make some really good points.
The link is here.
Monday, February 11, 2008
Yes, with all the progress we've made securing our own border, The US Gov't has decided to send 1.4 billion dollars to Mexico to secure it's own southern border... WTF? Over.
The link to the article by Bashman is here.
You have to see it to believe it folks....
Thursday, February 7, 2008
Every day a new quote from Albert Einstein pops ups up.
Some are better than others....
I particularly like this one though:
"The health of society thus depends quite as much on the independence of the individuals composing it as on their close political cohesion."
We should all do well to remember this.
If anyone is gonna be in the vicinity of FT.Hood between the 19th and 28th of February...drop me a line. I suspect I will not have much to do during my off-time....
For those of you that are aware...and those that may not be. The city of Berkeley has told our US Marines that they're unwelcome intruders. This is absolutely ridiculous.
The City council has apparently decided to oust the USMC recruiting station from their leftard city. They've encouraged groups like Code Pink to actively inhibit people from entering the establishment.
Evidence of this here.
According to Crimes and Criminal procedure 18c-2388.... (emphasis mine)
The entire section is here.
Sec. 2388. Activities affecting armed forces during war
(a) Whoever, when the United States is at war, willfully makes or conveys false reports or false statements with intent to interfere with the operation or success of the military or naval forces of the United States or to promote the success of its enemies; or Whoever, when the United States is at war, willfully causes or attempts to cause insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny, or refusal of duty, in the military or naval forces of the United States, or willfully obstructs the recruiting or enlistment service of the United States, to the injury of the service or the United States, or attempts to do so - Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.
(b) If two or more persons conspire to violate subsection (a) of this section and one or more such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each of the parties to such conspiracy shall be punished as provided in said subsection (a).
(c) Whoever harbors or conceals any person who he knows, or has reasonable grounds to believe or suspect, has committed, or is about to commit, an offense under this section, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
(d) This section shall apply within the admiralty and maritime jurisdiction of the United States, and on the high seas, as well as within the United States.
So there we have it folks. The City of Berkeley has shown it's true colors...
They've attempted to backpedal after coming under heavy fire form some of our Senators and Representitives. Saying that:
"we don't support the war, but we support the troops..."
Sorry this doesn't fly. Seems when the threat of federal funding being pulled pops up, they were suddenly quite apologetic.
Several of our senators are spearheading a bill to strip earmarks headed for Berkeley in the Omnibus bill and redirect those funds to the Marine Corps. Personally I'm all for this.
Some quotes by our Senators....
Senator Inhofe: "Unfortunately, those on the Berkeley city council do not seem to understand the sacrifice of the brave men and women of the United States Marine Corps. By interfering with military recruiting, the city of Berkeley is hampering our ability to protect this nation. While the city of Berkeley and the protestors are free to say whatever they like, free speech is not a protection from consequence."
Senator DeMint: "Berkeley needs to learn that their actions have consequences. Patriotic American taxpayers won't sit quietly while Berkeley insults our brave Marines and tries to run them out of town. Berkeley City Council members have shown complete ingratitude to our military and their families, and the city doesn't deserve a single dime of special pet project handouts."
Senator Cornyn: "The Berkeley City Council insulted our troops and offended people across the country. If the U.S. Marines are not good enough for Berkeley, neither are taxpayer dollars Congress would have sent there this year. That city closed its doors on the same individuals taking bullets on the front lines while fighting for the safety and freedom of families in Berkeley and throughout America."
Senator Vitter: "The actions of the City Council of Berkeley are in stark contrast to beliefs of the vast majority of Americans who recognize and honor the service and sacrifice of our U.S. Marines. This is simply unacceptable and those funds could be better utilized by the Marine Corps."
Senator Chambliss: "We need to send a strong message that our military personnel deserve our strongest support. Georgia is a proud military state, and my constituents will be out outraged to know that during a time of war, their taxpayers dollars have been used to reward folks who have insulted and disparaged those who defend this nation every day."
Dr. Coburn: "The actions by the city of Berkeley are deplorable and insulting to those who are serving and those who have paid the ultimate sacrifice to protect the very freedoms that are being exercised to insult them. I know I stand with the majority of Americans in thanking our service men and women for their selfless service to our nation."
CA Representitive- John Cambell is introducing a companion bill in the House.
If you agree that this is a criminal endeavor on the part of Berkeley...
Write your representitive.
Semper Fi Boys!!! Justice will be served!
H/T: Kurt(the infidel) at Pat Dollard
Ok, I was over at Dollard and saw a video of Ms. Naomi Wolf. She is obviously a passionate Libertarian. Ok, no big deal there. I am a closet libertarian myself. But let's get some things straight here. Libertarianism is in my mind the Conservative version of Utopia. It's a pipe dream folks. We live in a big world and the reality of our existence dictates how we deal with it, be we liberal or conservative.
What bothers me is that this woman has credentials and apparently a following. Of course it's not hard to get a following when you bash the CinC. There's always plenty of folks to jump on THAT bandwagon.
My issue is with the accusation that the Bush administration is Fascist.
All jokes aside. If you take what this woman says at face value...sure you can see her point. However I take exception to several of the "steps" towards a fascist state that she is pointing out as an indicator. I can't deny a couple of them, but then, whatever. The chance of Bush staging a coup are pretty much nil.
You can read the article here.
So without further ado....
Fascist America, in 10 easy steps
1. Invoke a terrifying internal and external enemy
...It is not that global Islamist terrorism is not a severe danger; of course it is. I am arguing rather that the language used to convey the nature of the threat is different in a country such as Spain - which has also suffered violent terrorist attacks - than it is in America. Spanish citizens know that they face a grave security threat; what we as American citizens believe is that we are potentially threatened with the end of civilisation as we know it. Of course, this makes us more willing to accept restrictions on our freedoms....
If anything, it seems to me that the Islamist threat has been downplayed with the language used by the bush administration. Not to mention our continued association with fundamentalist Islamic nations (read: Saudi Arabia)
2. Create a gulag
...With its jails in Iraq and Afghanistan, and, of course, Guantánamo in Cuba, where detainees are abused, and kept indefinitely without trial and without access to the due process of the law, America certainly has its gulag now. Bush and his allies in Congress recently announced they would issue no information about the secret CIA "black site" prisons throughout the world, which are used to incarcerate people who have been seized off the street...
Gulag? Is this woman nuts? If not for the intelligence gleaned during interrogations of these animals, where would we be now? Oh, and by the way, how many law-abiding citizens of the United States have been incarcerate here? Not to mention...that we are in a new age of global war. The enemy does not observe Geneva Convention rules. It does what id sees as necessary to achieve those ends. To believe that civilians...and American citizens at that will be secretly held here is in the realm of conspiracy theories. We've got bigger fish to fry and we don't have the manpower to pursue the war effort and worry about regular citizens that "might" be in cahoots with the enemy because they criticize the policies of the administration currently in office.
3. Develop a thug caste
OK...I just had to include the entire entry on this one...
...When leaders who seek what I call a "fascist shift" want to close down an open society, they send paramilitary groups of scary young men out to terrorise citizens. The Blackshirts roamed the Italian countryside beating up communists; the Brownshirts staged violent rallies throughout Germany. This paramilitary force is especially important in a democracy: you need citizens to fear thug violence and so you need thugs who are free from prosecution.
The years following 9/11 have proved a bonanza for America's security contractors, with the Bush administration outsourcing areas of work that traditionally fell to the US military. In the process, contracts worth hundreds of millions of dollars have been issued for security work by mercenaries at home and abroad. In Iraq, some of these contract operatives have been accused of involvement in torturing prisoners, harassing journalists and firing on Iraqi civilians. Under Order 17, issued to regulate contractors in Iraq by the one-time US administrator in Baghdad, Paul Bremer, these contractors are immune from prosecution
Yes, but that is in Iraq, you could argue; however, after Hurricane Katrina, the Department of Homeland Security hired and deployed hundreds of armed private security guards in New Orleans. The investigative journalist Jeremy Scahill interviewed one unnamed guard who reported having fired on unarmed civilians in the city. It was a natural disaster that underlay that episode - but the administration's endless war on terror means ongoing scope for what are in effect privately contracted armies to take on crisis and emergency management at home in US cities.
Thugs in America? Groups of angry young Republican men, dressed in identical shirts and trousers, menaced poll workers counting the votes in Florida in 2000. If you are reading history, you can imagine that there can be a need for "public order" on the next election day. Say there are protests, or a threat, on the day of an election; history would not rule out the presence of a private security firm at a polling station "to restore public order"...
Ok, now this really takes the cake. I don't suppose the proliferation of idiots like the Westboro Baptist church, code pink and any other group of nutjobs is even in the same category? Or how about all the stories of republicans, in multiple states being derided at the poll booth by the workers there. Or being deliberately given a democratic ticket to vote with despite being told multiple times that they're republican…I wonder how many of those folks accidentally voted in the democratic primary instead of the republican one…wtf over?
Let's not mince words here. Why don't you just come on out and say it. Blackwater Security is the big bad Thug organisation you're so afraid of. If you have half a brain and actually pay attention to detail, you would know that the security of our diplomats and other VIPs in hostile areas can't be covered by our already stretched thin military. These "professionals" are necessary. And I will not stoop so low as to call them a necessary evil...I would be more inclined to call them a necessary good. All this talk of security contractors stinks of the bullshit that went on in Iraq about checks and balances. We don't have that problem here dear. They are US citizens. If they step out of line here...they go to jail.
4. Set up an internal surveillance system
...In 2005 and 2006, when James Risen and Eric Lichtblau wrote in the New York Times about a secret state programme to wiretap citizens' phones, read their emails and follow international financial transactions, it became clear to ordinary Americans that they, too, could be under state scrutiny.
In closed societies, this surveillance is cast as being about "national security"; the true function is to keep citizens docile and inhibit their activism and dissent...
So, of course it always comes down to this…illegal wiretapping and surveillance of American citizens. Yeah, on principle I disagree with this, but the intelligence gathered has done an awful lot to keep us from experiencing a repeat of 9/11.
Quite frankly, as long as they're focused on the obvious threat, I don't much care. Especially since Congress still has the power to stop it at any time.
5. Harass citizens' groups
...Other harassment is more serious: the American Civil Liberties Union reports that thousands of ordinary American anti-war, environmental and other groups have been infiltrated by agents: a secret Pentagon database includes more than four dozen peaceful anti-war meetings, rallies or marches by American citizens in its category of 1,500 "suspicious incidents". The equally secret Counterintelligence Field Activity (Cifa) agency of the Department of Defense has been gathering information about domestic organisations engaged in peaceful political activities: Cifa is supposed to track "potential terrorist threats" as it watches ordinary US citizen activists. A little-noticed new law has redefined activism such as animal rights protests as "terrorism". So the definition of "terrorist" slowly expands to include the opposition...
So, the ACLU reports…yeah. Ok. These guys are about as un-American as it gets. In case you all haven't noticed…we're at war. Keeping tabs on "peaceful" organizations and protests is nothing new. Perhaps if there had been more tabs being kept on David Korresh (sp?) we wouldn't have had such a crazy thing happen as Waco. Or what about Timothy McVey? Concerned citizens starting up militia groups that have anti-government leanings. Why? Maybe because they don't feel the government is protecting their freedoms properly. Just a hunch.
And in all honesty, I think that The socialist Dems are way worse for our national security than any Bush administration ever could be.
And what's wrong with monitoring activists. Zealots of any color are dangerous.
6. Engage in arbitrary detention and release
...In 2004, America's Transportation Security Administration confirmed that it had a list of passengers who were targeted for security searches or worse if they tried to fly. People who have found themselves on the list? Two middle-aged women peace activists in San Francisco; liberal Senator Edward Kennedy; a member of Venezuela's government - after Venezuela's president had criticised Bush; and thousands of ordinary US citizens...
I think what is most important to discern here is that just because you're on a watchlist or detained and questioned about possible subversive activities is no big deal. Are you being handcuffed, jailed and humiliated? Doesn't sound like it to me. So Mr. Mayfield was "mistakenly" identified…are you sure? Where is the evidence? If they seized his computer, what led them to his computer to begin with? Hmmmm….
Well, let's see. How about a little history lesson. Does anyone remember Jane Fonda? Yeah. Peace activist...commie sympathiser. Oh, and a member of the Venezuelan Gov't...the same one that is openly calling for the demise of this great country? Hugo Chavez does not just criticize Bush ma'am, He criticizes America. He is a socialist. He hates capitalists...particularly powerful nations like us.
7. Target key individuals
...Bush supporters in state legislatures in several states put pressure on regents at state universities to penalise or fire academics who have been critical of the administration. As for civil servants, the Bush administration has derailed the career of one military lawyer who spoke up for fair trials for detainees, while an administration official publicly intimidated the law firms that represent detainees pro bono by threatening to call for their major corporate clients to boycott them.
Elsewhere, a CIA contract worker who said in a closed blog that "waterboarding is torture" was stripped of the security clearance she needed in order to do her job....
Yeah and yet we allowed Columbia University to invite the president of Iran into our country and speak to the students. Our enemy was invited to come to our hallowed shores.
So a contractor was fired for stating their personal opinion about waterboarding…hmmm and they worked for the CIA? Well, seems like they were justified in at least reassigning this person. You can't have personnel in direct conflict of interest in a position that requires keeping classified information out of the public eye. Closed blog? What do you mean by that? That it wasn't posted on the internet and people without the need to know were privy to this employees thoughts about a tactic used on certain detainees to glean information? Sounds like they were perfectly within their right. Sometimes you have to know when to keep your mouth shut…I believe we call that OPSEC.
8. Control the press
...Other reporters and writers have been punished in other ways. Joseph C Wilson accused Bush, in a New York Times op-ed, of leading the country to war on the basis of a false charge that Saddam Hussein had acquired yellowcake uranium in Niger. His wife, Valerie Plame, was outed as a CIA spy - a form of retaliation that ended her career.
Prosecution and job loss are nothing, though, compared with how the US is treating journalists seeking to cover the conflict in Iraq in an unbiased way. The Committee to Protect Journalists has documented multiple accounts of the US military in Iraq firing upon or threatening to fire upon unembedded (meaning independent) reporters and camera operators from organisations ranging from al-Jazeera to the BBC. While westerners may question the accounts by al-Jazeera, they should pay attention to the accounts of reporters such as the BBC's Kate Adie. In some cases reporters have been wounded or killed, including ITN's Terry Lloyd in 2003. Both CBS and the Associated Press in Iraq had staff members seized by the US military and taken to violent prisons; the news organisations were unable to see the evidence against their staffers...
Do you really believe the Bush administration is in control of the media? You obviously have a screw loose somewhere. Something that all you freedom of information folks out there have to understand is that not all information should be published. Especially if it can jeopardize OUR combat operations. Lets see, NY Times ring a bell to anyone? When you have photographers and journalist set up in a stakeout position to capture our troops being ambushed by insurgents…or even worse captured video of an IED taking out a military vehicle…and I'm sure killing some of our men and women in uniform. The propaganda war is being won by the enemy because of those selfsame bloodsucking leeches. The real truth from the lies? Try reading PatDollard or Michael Yon sometime. There are some Americans that know the MSM is lies and misdirection. It's all about ratings and what is good for their agendas. The real truthseekers are few and far between. If you see something on the news that disturbs you…do some research.
9. Dissent equals treason
...Cast dissent as "treason" and criticism as "espionage'. Every closing society does this, just as it elaborates laws that increasingly criminalise certain kinds of speech and expand the definition of "spy" and "traitor". When Bill Keller, the publisher of the New York Times, ran the Lichtblau/Risen stories, Bush called the Times' leaking of classified information "disgraceful", while Republicans in Congress called for Keller to be charged with treason, and rightwing commentators and news outlets kept up the "treason" drumbeat. Some commentators, as Conason noted, reminded readers smugly that one penalty for violating the Espionage Act is execution...
Ms. Wolf…with all due respect, judging from what you've just written here, you are not an advocate of freedom, but of anarchy. When a news media giant like the times obviously leaks classified information, at what point to we turn our backs and say, hey it's cool. Go ahead why don't we just supply the media with all of our strategies, tactics and detailed op-orders of all our major engagements.
Point being a line must be drawn when such events occur.
10. Suspend the rule of law
...The John Warner Defense Authorization Act of 2007 gave the president new powers over the national guard. This means that in a national emergency - which the president now has enhanced powers to declare - he can send Michigan's militia to enforce a state of emergency that he has declared in Oregon, over the objections of the state's governor and its citizens.
Even as Americans were focused on Britney Spears's meltdown and the question of who fathered Anna Nicole's baby, the New York Times editorialised about this shift: "A disturbing recent phenomenon in Washington is that laws that strike to the heart of American democracy have been passed in the dead of night ... Beyond actual insurrection, the president may now use military troops as a domestic police force in response to a natural disaster, a disease outbreak, terrorist attack or any 'other condition'."...
I'm not so sure about this. I can see how under unusual circumstances, such as those listed above that the Nat'l Guard could be used to help out in whatever way necessary in such events. Let's see, do you think the regular police forces and emergency personnel of a given region are ever truly adequate in such situations?
I'm not sure about this one…I will give you credit on this. Score one for you. Iam not a lawyer so this is something I cannot argue intelligently about. It seems a knee-jerk reaction , but I could be off-base.
Ok...I have include quite a bit of Ms. Wolf's conclusion here...
...As Americans turn away quite leisurely, keeping tuned to internet shopping and American Idol, the foundations of democracy are being fatally corroded. Something has changed profoundly that weakens us unprecedentedly: our democratic traditions, independent judiciary and free press do their work today in a context in which we are "at war" in a "long war" - a war without end, on a battlefield described as the globe, in a context that gives the president - without US citizens realising it yet - the power over US citizens of freedom or long solitary incarceration, on his say-so alone.
That means a hollowness has been expanding under the foundation of all these still- free-looking institutions - and this foundation can give way under certain kinds of pressure. To prevent such an outcome, we have to think about the "what ifs".
What if, in a year and a half, there is another attack - say, God forbid, a dirty bomb? The executive can declare a state of emergency. History shows that any leader, of any party, will be tempted to maintain emergency powers after the crisis has passed. With the gutting of traditional checks and balances, we are no less endangered by a President Hillary than by a President Giuliani - because any executive will be tempted to enforce his or her will through edict rather than the arduous, uncertain process of democratic negotiation and compromise.
What if the publisher of a major US newspaper were charged with treason or espionage, as a rightwing effort seemed to threaten Keller with last year? What if he or she got 10 years in jail? What would the newspapers look like the next day? Judging from history, they would not cease publishing; but they would suddenly be very polite...
Although I admire your passion for freedom Ms. Wolf. I must say you are definitely casting stones in the wrong direction. We are a federated republic…not a democracy. At least not in the strict sense. Our true enemy is the socialists in our midst. As a libertarian, you should see this. On principle, I believe in libertarian philosophy. However it is only that. It is to me the utopia of conservative thought. Unrealistic but nice to dream about.
We are just one country (albeit the strongest) in the world. We do more for others than any other country on the planet and we are reviled for doing so…why? Because they are afraid of us and jealous of our prosperity. They take with one hand while casting rude gestures with the other. And yet we still treat them with dignity. I am not a big fan of Mr. Bush. He has shown in the past term to be weak. I am disappointed with him. However I will defend him against such an accusation as Fascist to the bitter end.
You my good woman are nuts.
Wednesday, February 6, 2008
PLEASE do some research, educate yourselves. The dream of world peace is just that...a dream. borne on the backs of those who stand firm against oppression. Without these warriors and proponents of freedom, the notion of world peace would've died out a long time ago.
I will refer you to India. India has been under siege for centuries by the Islamic Jihad. They are unrelenting. They refuse to accept that any other religion can hold sway in any civilization.
They really don't like those darn Hindus in India. no sir.
H/T Pam Gellar at Atlas Shrugs
...For centuries; Muslims have shown obsessive ferocity to destroy Hindu civilization and India by ideological, military and other violent means. The fact is that Jihad war is endemic and Muslims have been waging war against infidel Hindus for centuries. The real cause of the never-ending Jihadi terrorism is the unremitting desire of Muslims to annihilate infidel Hindus. The hatred and intolerance are fueled by fanaticism and intransigence and unwillingness to accept diversity in religion. Muslim extremists interpret Jihad primarily in terms of the use of force to impose Islam on others and to fight "infidels" to conquer the world. Muslims are united in their hatred against "infidel Hindus"...
So if you really value your multi-culti ideals....how can you stand by and watch as a brutal, tyrranical religion attempt to destroy those self-same ideals? The idea of living blindly...thinking that Islam is not the cause of this is mind-boggling to those of us who have done the research and read the Koran. Personally I still have much to learn about these psychos, but there are plenty of studies done by extremely level-headed and competent scholars on this subject. I believe them. From what I ahve read, and what i've learned from other scholars as well as apostates from Islam. We should be worried about them and we should unite to defeat them.
They've gained footholds in Europe and even here in the Americas. But we still cling to this notion of "moderate" muslims and muslim reformation. Good Luck with that. While Al-Qaeda is kidnapping children in Iraq and indoctrinating them to their extremely over-zealous, jihadist beliefs, we wonder why we're in Iraq? They are efectively perpetuating their cause by targeting the children of the next generation. We should be doing the same. Educate these kids. Shoot, educate all those over there that simply don't know any different. We can decisively defeat them in any military operation, but we cannot beat them in the war for hearts and minds if we ignore the reality.
I implore you....educate yourself and see if your misguided belief in diplomacy with these nutjobs is founded in idealism or reality...I can assure you that it is merely a fantasy of our idealistic "feel-good" mentality here in the west. They have no such qualms about their tactics.
I will step off my soap box for now.
Think, ruminate, reflect...
Monday, February 4, 2008
This is another must read. This essay is written by Jonathan Fine, a research fellow at the International Institute for Counter-Terrorism. This guy knows what he's talking about.
The major Islamist terror tactic has, since the early 1980s, been the suicide bomber. In contrast to secular terrorists, Islamist suicide terrorists need not escape; their planning focuses instead on how to deliver the perpetrator to the target area. Suicide bombers are walking smart bombs, able to position themselves among crowds or in restaurants to achieve maximum carnage. During the 2001-02 terror wave in Israel, Hamas and Islamic Jihad bombers, for example, made last minute target selections in order to bolster the number of civilians they could kill. Islamist terrorists also need not use time to augment their demands. While the Marxist groups of the 1970s might have threatened hostages against concrete demands, Islamists seek to kill first and lecture later. Islamists do take hostages but, in such cases, their goal is as likely to be to draw out terror in a 24-hour news cycle than to win concessions.
The Essay in it's entirety can be found here.
This is a great essay writen by CPT Melvin E. Lee.
CPT Lee is a Captain in the US Navy.
One of the greatest challenges facing strategic leaders today is objectively examining the centuries-old roots of Islamic jihadism and developing a strategy that will lead to a lasting solution to the Western conflict with it. Many Western policymakers fail to assess realistically why Arab and Islamic governments have been unable to improve the condition of their populations, especially in contrast to the West. This inability to grasp the root of Islamic jihadism is the result of a moral relativism prominent in modern Western liberal thought. For example, over the last few decades, it has become common to value diversity and multiculturalism above societal well-being and improvements in the human condition.
The entire essay can be found here...well worth a read..and extremely enlightening. Lots of good history lessons here.
Excessive deference to Islam.
By Mark Steyn
My favorite headline of the year so far comes from The Daily Mail in Britain: “Government Renames Islamic Terrorism As ‘Anti-Islamic Activity’ To Woo Muslims.”
Her Majesty’s government is not alone in feeling it’s not always helpful to link Islam and the, ah, various unpleasantnesses with suicide bombers and whatnot. Even in his cowboy Crusader heyday, President Bush liked to cool down the crowd with a lot of religion-of-peace stuff. But the British have now decided that kind of mealy-mouthed “respect” is no longer sufficient. So, henceforth, any terrorism perpetrated by persons of an Islamic persuasion will be designated “anti-Islamic activity” Britain’s home secretary, Jacqui Smith, unveiled the new brand name in a speech a few days ago. “There is nothing Islamic about the wish to terrorize, nothing Islamic about plotting murder, pain and grief,” she told her audience. “Indeed, if anything, these actions are anti-Islamic.”
You can read the rest here.
After having dug to a depth of 20 meters last year, English scientists found traces of copper wire dating back over 200 years and came to the conclusion that their ancestors already had a telephone network 200 years ago.
Not to be outdone by the English, in the weeks that followed, Scottish scientists dug to a depth of 30 meters, and shortly after, headlines in the UK newspapers read: 'Scottish archaeologists have found traces of 300 year old copper wire and have concluded that their ancestors already had an advanced high-tech communications network a hundred years earlier than the English.'
One week later, The Daily Jigger, an Irish newspaper, reported the following: 'After digging as deep as 40 meters, Paddy McMahon, a self taught archaeologist, reported that he found absolutely nothing'. Paddy has therefore concluded that 400 years ago Ireland had already gone wireless.