Republican Senator Mel Martinez of Florida seems to think that the courts don't have the power to force Obama to revel his birth certificate since the people voted him in.
Whoa...slow down there a sec. So what you're saying senator, is that"the people have spoken". That's it!?
That's your explanation for the dozens of lawsuits filed by citizens in an attempt to get the truth about Barak Obama's birthplace!?
For shame sir! You are a servant of the people, and I do believe you also swore an oath to beaqr true faith and allegiance to the constitution. Like I did and all my fellow brothers and sisters in arms. This is a very simple request and to ignore it is criminal. Treasonous. If it's such a trivial matter, why not just make it happen? How hard is it to provide a birth certificate sir? This started way before the primaries sir. Why have the people's voices not been heard by the courts? why have we all been silenced?
Ignore us sir, if you must, but know this...if you cannot feel the revolution that is brewing. Simmering. Waiting to boil over, you deserve what you get sir. Our public servant would be wise to rememebr their role in the government, and that is as servant to the people. We are not your slaves sir and we refuse to be led to showers. There are plenty of us that understand what it means to be free. Freedom means responsibility. Freedom and independence are not just flashy catch words, they have a very deep and profound meaning for free men. And we understand that. Something you seem to have forgotten sir. Freedom form responsibility is what you and your liberal cronies have been teaching our kids and drilling into our heads. That is deception sir. A man or woman free of responsibility is not free at all sir.
I read about this at World Net Daily. The article is here.
I think it may be time to start sharpening our pitchforks....
Die with your boots on....
...
3 comments:
Our "leaders" seem to think we live in a mobocracy, and that whatever a simple majority can be manipulated into voting for shall be the "law of the land"...
...well, except when it doesn't please them.
Note the current California struggle of The People against the government, who is leading the fight to vacate a legitimate vote of The People...the second such vote...to preserve marriage as a union between a man and a women.
The first vote, an initiative, was deemed unconstitutional. The second vote, in response to that decision, amended the Constitution
The Attorney General of California is seeking a decision from the California Supreme Court...which agrees with his opinion that, "The People do not have the right to amend the Constitution."
One is left speechless by such criminal hubris.
And I am left speechless at that.
How could anyone, regardless of how they feel about a certain issue, condone a statement such as that? "The people do not have the right to amend the constitution"?!?
WTF? wow, I feel for you in CA. Our rights are continually being eroded here in AZ as well. At least we have enough straight people to keep the prop legal here. Personally I don't really care a whole lot what sort of personal life people decide to indulge in as long as it doesn't interfere with my rights, but the whole marriage thing isn't even about love, it's about legality and the perks that go along with it. *sigh*
now I among your readers
Post a Comment